|
|
| SBP3005 | Planning Studio - IV | 4+4+0 | ECTS:10 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of URBAN and REGIONAL PLANNING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | SBP2004-Planning Studio III must have been passed | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 4 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Beyza KARADENİZ | | Co-Lecturer | Department staff | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The aim is to acquaint students with area definition of different scales and levels of regional planning (regional/watershed/sub-subregion/city-region/metropolitan city/region) for a study area composed of province, city and their near environs and with the contents and techniques of plans in these levels. In this framework, defining settlement hirarchies and network relations and making macro analyses on an area integrated in terms of sectoral, spatial and functional context, policy making and plan preparation. To acquaint students with the policy and planning components of hierachical planning order and with the approaches of regional models analyses/syntheses and planning. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | define and explain social, economic, political, administrative interrelations among settlements. | 1,5,7,17 | 3,5 | | LO - 2 : | analyse upper scale planning arae (region, sub-region, metropolitan, etc.) socially, economically, environmentally, physically, etc. and will be able decide appropriate techniques for these. | 1,5,7,17 | 3,5,6 | | LO - 3 : | transfer and interpret local planning issues to upper scale plans. | 1,5,7,17 | 4,6 | | LO - 4 : | evaluate the outcomes of plan alternatives on different aspects. | 1,5,7,17 | 6 | | LO - 5 : | propose policies and planning application tools appropriate for a particular planning level. | 1,5,7,17 | 3,6 | | LO - 6 : | use communication techniques, in presenting and defending orally and visually his/her own upper scale works in front of an audience. | 1,5,7,17 | 5,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Global, national, local developments and new policies; international and cross-national organizations, cross-border regions, regional disparities, concept of urban region settlement networks and their spatial reflections; rural-urban relations. Resources and sectors (environmental, natural and historical values, sectors, their regional impacts and interactions). National development strategies and regional / sub-regional development vision. Regional population and labor force structure and their distribution; development directions, magnitudes and macroforms of settlements. Sectoral location criteria. Macro decisions, growth poles/networks in urban and rural areas. 1/100.000 scale regional plan, and its upper scale (1/250.000 etc)provincial and its near environs regional develmnet plan together with its lower scale (1/25.000) city-region structure plan and plan codes, policies.
Policy making for priority and characteristic regions and sectors. Definition of implementation priorities and strategies. Data/analyses/computations in the process of preparing regional plans and reports in different scales, evaluation methods and techniques and preparing those plans and thier reports.
|
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Completion of Analytical etude report;
1st Jury (analytical etude internship) | | | Week 2 | 1st Jury (analytical etude works)
Eskişehir Province and its Near Environs Regional Development Scheme (RDS)
(1/300 000 scale) (Data collection and analysis stage)
Lecture 1: Definition of the region and basic concepts, theories, models, and techniques for regional planning and Regional Plan Samples | | | Week 3 | Final Research Report submission
Eskişehir Province and its Near Environs Regional Development Scheme (RDS)
(1/300 000 scale) (Data collection and analysis stage)
Lecture 2: Extrapolation Techniques and Labor Force-Economic Activity-based Population Projection Method
Lecture 3: Purpose, Vision, Strategies/Policies and Targets in Regional Planning and associating them with sustainable development objectives and plan decisions. | | | Week 4 | Eskişehir Province and its Near Environs Regional Development Scheme
(1/300 000) (Synthesis stage)
Short Quiz on Analytical Research Final Report | | | Week 5 | Creating a synthesis for 1/300,000 scale RDS, making its conceptual and spatial expression, creating plan decisions and notes | | | Week 6 | Completion of 1/300,000 scale RDS in its entirety with its plans, reports and notes | | | Week 7 | 1:300,000 Scale Regional Development Scheme Evaluation Jury | | | Week 8 | | | | Week 9 | MID-TERM WEEK | | | Week 10 | | | | Week 11 | | | | Week 12 | | | | Week 13 | | | | Week 14 | | | | Week 15 | | | | Week 16 | 4th Jury / Final Jury (All scales) | | | |
| 1 | Aydemir, S., Aydemir, S., Öksüz, A., M., Özyaba, M., Sancar, C., Beyazlı, D., Ş., Türk, Y., A., 2004; Kentsel Alanların Planlanması ve Tasarımı, Akademi Yayınevi, Trabzon. | | | |
| 1 | Arkon, C. 1988; Şehir Planlamada Niceliksel Teknikler, DEÜ Müh.-Mim. Fakültesi Yayınları, İzmir | | | 2 | Çubukçu, K. M., 2015, Planlamada Klasik Sayısal Yöntemler, 2. Basım, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara | | | 3 | Tekeli, İ. 2008; Türkiye'de Bölgesel Eşitsizlik ve Bölge Planlama Yazıları, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul. | | | 4 | Eraydın, A. (ed.) 2006; Değişen Mekân, Dost Kitabevi, Ankara. | | | 5 | Taneri, E., 1986; Bölge Planlama, Doğan Matbaası, İstanbul | | | 6 | Hall, P., 2002; Urban and Regional Planning, Routledge, London and New York | | | 7 | David, A., P., (ed.). 2007; Regional Planning, Edward Elgar, UK | | | 8 | Göçer, O., 1990; Ülke Planlama İlkeleri, Yıldız Üniv. Matbaası, İstanbul | | | 9 | Atalık, G., 1989; Bölge Planlamasına Giriş, İTÜ Matbaası, İstanbul | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Quiz | 3
9 | 14/11/2019 | 4 | 15 | | Presentation | 2
6
12 | 26/09/2019
24/10/2019
05/12/2019 | 24 | 30 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 14/01/2020
14/01/2020 | 16 | 55 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 8 | 14 | 112 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 8 | 12 | 96 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Uygulama | 6 | 1 | 6 | | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Kısa sınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 25 | 3 | 75 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 10 | 1 | 10 | | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 303 |
|