|
|
| SBP3007 | Planning Theories and Techniques | 3+0+0 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of URBAN and REGIONAL PLANNING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Gökhan Hüseyin ERKAN | | Co-Lecturer | Asst.Prf.Dr. Gökhan Hüseyin ERKAN | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The overarching goal of the course is to enable the students to develop competing convictions; in theoretical terms, the course will facilitate a thorough understanding of linkages methodology and praxis. The course aims to provide the students with planning thought and theories from early post war theory to planning theory to 1990s such as town planning as physical planning and design to system planning, rational comprehensive planning, paradigm shifts, modernism and post modernism etc. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | understand and compare the planning theories | 1,2 | 1, | | LO - 2 : | develop his/her own standpoint within of competing convictions, compere and choice appropriate one | 1,2 | 1, | | LO - 3 : | learn to establish linkages between theory and practice and use | 1,2 | 1, | | LO - 4 : | question and to continually revise their own positions | 1,2 | 1, | | LO - 5 : | communicate productively within the academic and community milieu | 1,2 | 1, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| The course will address on theory in planning, planning in theory; rational comprehensive planning, system planning, advocative planning and pluralism, pragmatism, modernism and post modernism in planning, sustainability; planning process; plan evaluation techniques. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Introduction: content and method of the course. The scope of the planning theory | | | Week 2 | Approaches in urbanism in pre-industrial era: historicists, utopians, remedialists | | | Week 3 | The birth of modern planning idea in industrialisation period | | | Week 4 | Rationalism in Planning: Comprehensive Planning Approach | | | Week 5 | The Politics of Rational Planning ,Publicity and Planning Thory | | | Week 6 | The pozitivist theories of planning,Normative planning | | | Week 7 | Planning theory after paradigm shifts in social science
Post-modern critique for Planning Theory | | | Week 8 | Liberal Critics for comprehencive planning | | | Week 9 | Midterm study | | | Week 10 | Pluralism and Advocative Planning | | | Week 11 | Communicative Planning Aproach and Participation Techniques in Planning | | | Week 12 | Strategic Planning | | | Week 13 | Marxist critique for Planning Theory: City and Planning in the Production Process of Capital | | | Week 14 | Lefebvre and Production of Space | | | Week 15 | Risk Society and Planning | | | Week 16 | Final Exam | | | |
| 1 | Ersoy, M. (der.) 2016; Kentsel Planlama Kuramları, 3. Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara | | | 2 | Camhis, M. 1983; Neden Planlama Kuramı ve Bilim Felsefesi. Mimarlık 11-12, ss. 14-21. | | | 3 | Harvey, D. 2002; Toplumsal Adalet, Postmodernism ve Kent.? 20. Yüzyıl Kenti, der. ve çev B. Duru ve A. Alkan, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara, ss. 215-248. | | | 4 | Aydemir, Ş. vd.; 1999, Kentsel Alanların Planlanması ve Tasarımı, KTÜ Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları, Trabzon | | | 5 | Beck, U. 2014. Risk Toplumu: Başka Bir Modernliğe Doğru, çev. B. Doğan, İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul | | | 6 | Şengül, T. 2009; Kentsel Çelişki ve Siyaset, 2. Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara | | | |
| 1 | Taylor, N. 1999; Urban Planning Theory since 1945, SAGE Publications, Londra | | | 2 | Özlem, D. 2003. Kavramlar ve Tarihleri, İnkılap Yayınevi, İstanbul | | | 3 | Campbell, S. ve Fainstein, S. (der.), 2003; A Readings in Planning Theory, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 29/11/2023 | 1 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 17/01/2023 | 1 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 4 | 10 | 40 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 10 | 1 | 10 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Ödev | 3 | 2 | 6 | | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 12 | 1 | 12 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 112 |
|