|
|
| SBP3003 | Regional Planning | 2+0+0 | ECTS:3 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of URBAN and REGIONAL PLANNING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sinem DEDEOĞLU ÖZKAN | | Co-Lecturer | | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | To introduce the region, related concepts, and approaches in regional planning in a comparative manner, and with a general perspective, to inform about the theories and techniques in the process of regional planning which has an important role and function in the planning hierarchy. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | Comprehend the theories of region, and learn how to determine the regional boundaries and how to make a hierarchy of settlements. | 1,5,8,12 | 1, | | LO - 2 : | Make comparison on the determination of regional boundaries, regional concepts and planning principles by use of different examples. | 1,5,8,12 | 1, | | LO - 3 : | Identify and resolve the problems of regional inequalities and its possible effects. | 1,5,8,12 | 1, | | LO - 4 : | Comprehend that the sustainable and balanced development are the bases of policies for spatial and regional planning and analyze the related problems. | 1,5,8,12 | 1, | | LO - 5 : | Acquire competency in regional problem solving through regional analysis techniques. | 1,5,8,12 | 1, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Concept of region, its changing meaning and principles in its determination. The importance of regional planning in spatial planning process and sustainable development. Regionalization, settlement hierarchy and comparison of different examples of regional planning. Basic regional theories and theories of regional growth and development. The general context of regional analysis techniques and examples. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Explanations about the purpose of the course, content, scope, topics to be covered and process management | | | Week 2 | Region concept, definitions, changing content and basic functions | | | Week 3 | Principles in determining regions, planning scales and regional planning | | | Week 4 | Basic theories of region | | | Week 5 | Historical development of regional planning science and its applications in Türkiye; regional planning conception and studies in Türkiye within the context of different periods of political, economic, urbanization, legal and administrative structures | | | Week 6 | The changing meaning of region in EU and regional objectives and policies of EU within the context of common objectives and strategies | | | Week 7 | Definition of region, concepts related to region, determination and classification of region, organizational and funding studies in EU | | | Week 8 | The evaluation of EU regional studies and concepts and regionalization and settlement hierarchy studies in Türkiye, the comparison of regional planning approaches in EU and Türkiye | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | The theories of regional growth and development, the theories developed from the national economic growth and development models | | | Week 11 | Regional anaysis techniques | | | Week 12 | Contd. | | | Week 13 | The comparison of regional planning and analysis techniques on examples from Turkey and the world | | | Week 14 | Regional planning studies in Turkey | | | Week 15 | Contd. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Atalık, G. (1989) Bölge Planlamasına Giriş, İstanbul: İTÜ Matbaası | | | 2 | Tekeli, İ. (2008). Türkiye'de bölgesel eşitsizlik ve bölge planlama yazıları (Vol. 2). Tarih Vakfı. | | | 3 | Dinler, Z. (2014). Bölgesel İktisat, Ekin Kitabevi. Bursa | | | 4 | Akgül, B., & Efe, M. (2010). Dünyada ve Türkiye?de bölge planlama çalışmaları ve bunların karşılaştırılması. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 19(4), 19-45. | | | 5 | Özel, M. (2003) Avrupa Birliği'nde bölge, bölgeselleşme, bölge yönetimleri kavramları üzerine, AÜ SBF Dergisi, 58(1):97-117 | | | 6 | Ersoy, M. (2006). İmar mevzuatımızda planlama kademeleri ve üst ölçek planlama sorunu. Bölgesel Kalkınma ve Yönetişim Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, 215-231. | | | 7 | Ergen, Y.B., Dede, O.M., Ayten, A.M., Yazar, K.H. ve Ergen, M. (2007) İstatistiki Bölge Birimi Kavramına Eleştirel bir Yaklaşım: Kayseri-Sivas-Yozgat örneği üzerine bir değerlendirme, İTÜ, Mimarlık Fakültesi,12. Ulusal Bölge Bilimi/Bölge Planlama Kongresi, Bölge Biliminde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Bildiriler Kitabı içinde, 33-38 | | | 8 | Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Bölgesel Gelişme Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Üçüncü bölüm: Plan bölge ve alt bölgelerin tespiti alt komisyonu raporu, 60-83, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/bolgesel/oik523.pdf | | | 9 | Özgür, E. M. (2010) Ankara Üniversitesi-Coğrafya Bölümü-Bölgesel Coğrafya Anabilim Dalı (COG 113) Yerleşme Coğrafyasına Giriş dersi notları, Ankara. http://www.geography.humanity.ankara.edu.tr/ders_notu/COG113_ders_notu_1011.pdf (erişim: 03.11.2010) | | | 10 | Garipağaoğlu, N. (2017). Bölge planlama ve Türkiye'de mekânsal planlama yaklaşımları. Yeditepe Yayınevi. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 27/11/2023 | 1 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 15/01/2024 | 1 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 11 | 22 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 3 | 11 | 33 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 8 | 1 | 8 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Ödev | 3 | 3 | 9 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 15 | 1 | 15 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 90 |
|