|
|
| MIM4005-3 | Architectural Project - VII | 4+4+0 | ECTS:9 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | MIM3018-Architectural Project-VI must have been passed | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 4 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Sonay ÇEVİK | | Co-Lecturer | Related lecturers of Department of Architecture | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Demonstrate that architectural design is a semi-autonomous discipline, and designing task takes place as an integral part of general town planning and is dependent on site and societal properties. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | render philosophical and artistic discussions on architecture. | 3 | 3,6 | | LO - 2 : | developed a view of national realities, postmodern deregulation policies and regional stances. | 3 | 3,6 | | LO - 3 : | test their proposals against existing urban context. | 3 | 3,6, | | LO - 4 : | opinionated in larger design context, principles of energy saving, ecology and sustainability. | 3 | 3,6 | | LO - 5 : | surefooted in protection and preservation principles. | 3 | 3,6 | | LO - 6 : | confident in urban transformation projects. | 3 | 3,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Global philosophical and artistic discussions, national realities, postmodern deregulation policies and regional stances are incorporated into workshop. Architectural studio work takes over the options of town planning in relation to specified site; mutual relations of proposals and the existing town are reflectively brought to the design board. According to regional properties sources of natural energy with respect to sustainability, protection and preservation qualities and principles of approach to such specific sites, urban transformation projects can be issues to attack in this workshop. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Acknowledgement of the subject of the term project, pre-design phase konwledge and discussions. | | | Week 2 | Information gathering and sharing with the other participants. | | | Week 3 | Information gathering and sharing with the other participants; determining the program. | | | Week 4 | Site seing; modeling the sit and submission of analysis. | | | Week 5 | First sketches; expounding on ideas and concepts. | | | Week 6 | Producing alternative solutions. | | | Week 7 | Choise among the alternatives baed on the criteria sugested by the dialogue between the master and the students. | | | Week 8 | Development phase | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Solution of structural problems. | | | Week 11 | Revision of the project due to the water & electric distribution, heating, air conditioning, the sewage system and security measures. | | | Week 12 | Development of sections and elevations. | | | Week 13 | Changing the scale of project to have a closer look at functional, structural and other problems. | | | Week 14 | Materials, colors and texture revisions. | | | Week 15 | Information on presentation techniques and methods. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Lawson, Bryan How designers think-the design process demystified. Oxford: Oxford UP. 1997. | | | 2 | Rowe, Peter G. Design Thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press.1987. | | | 3 | Schön, Donald A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith. | | | 4 | Hiller, B., Leaman, A., The Architecture and Architecture", The Models and Systems in Architecture and Building, RIBA, Londra, 1975. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | | 4 | | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 | | 8 | | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 03/06/2022 | 6 | 100 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 8 | 14 | 112 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 5 | 14 | 70 | | Uygulama | 4 | 14 | 56 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 30 | 1 | 30 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 270 |
|