|
|
| MIM2017 | Architectural Project - III | 4+4+0 | ECTS:9 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | MIM1006-Architectural Project - II must have been passed | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 4 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. İlkay ÖZDEMİR | | Co-Lecturer | Related lecturers of Department of Architecture | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Primary skills in structural approach and in handling space/structure relations are enhanced. Further attention is given to the choice of solid, stable and economic structural systems and appropriate materials. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | gain knowledge on design context | 1 | 3,6 | | LO - 2 : | gain knowledge on space context and architectural structure | 9 | 3,6 | | LO - 3 : | learn stable and economic structural systems | 9 | 3,6 | | LO - 4 : | develop form and function concepts at the architectural design. | 3 | 3,6 | | LO - 5 : | gain knowledge on architectural design and architectural design theories, architectural structure urban design and architecture history. | 8 | 3,6 | | LO - 6 : | learn model and architectural draw techniques | 1 | 3,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Student-generated solutions for a building situation are primarily explored in terms of structural characteristics in addition to the functional, symbolical and utilitarian aspects. Structural knowledge gained hitherto is anticipated to corroborate in the studio work. Viability and feasibility of design and its structural elements are examined in a realistic manner. Building details are diligently studied and materials are carefully employed in relatively small projects. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Acknowledgement of the subject of the term project, pre-design phase knowledge and discussions. | | | Week 2 | Information gathering and sharing with the other participants | | | Week 3 | Information gathering and sharing with the other participants; determining the program | | | Week 4 | Site seeing; modeling the site and submission of analysis | | | Week 5 | First sketches; ewpounding on ideas and concepts | | | Week 6 | Producing alternative solutions | | | Week 7 | Choise among the alternatives based on the criteria suggested by the dialogue between the master and the students. | | | Week 8 | Development phase | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Solution of structural problems | | | Week 11 | Revision of the project due to the water & electric distribution, heating, air conditioning,the sewage system and security measures. | | | Week 12 | Development of sections and elevations. | | | Week 13 | Changing the scale of project to have a closer look at functional, structural and other problems. | | | Week 14 | Materials, colors and texture revisions. | | | Week 15 | Information on presentation techniques and methods. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Kuban, D., Mimarlık Kavramları, Yem Yayın, İstanbul, 1990. | | | 2 | Lang, J., "Theoris of Perception and Formal Design", Designing For Human Behavior, Lang, J., Burnette,C., Molesk, W., Vachon, D. (Der.), Dowden,Hutchinson and Ross, Pa., 1974, pp:98-111. | | | 3 | Appleyard, D., "Why Buildings are Known: A Predictive Tool for Architects and Planners", Environment and Behavior, Vol. 1, No: 2, pp: 23-39. | | | 4 | Grassi, G., An Opinion on Architectural Education, A.C.S.A Conference, Hollanda, 1992, pp:13-24 | | | 5 | Rapoport, A., Kültür Mimarlık Tasarım, Yapı Endüstri Merkezi, Yapı Yayın-105, Çeviri: Selçuk Batur, İstanbul, 2004. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 03-06/11/2018 | 4 | | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 | | 8 | | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 28/12/2018 | 6 | 100 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 8 | 14 | 112 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 5 | 14 | 70 | | Uygulama | 4 | 14 | 56 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 30 | 1 | 30 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 270 |
|