|
|
| PEM 120 | Environmental Design Project - I | 4+4+0 | ECTS:8 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 4 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Cengiz ACAR | | Co-Lecturer | Asst. Prof. Dr. Banu Çiçek Kurdoğlu, Asst. Prof. Dr. Sema Mumcu, Asst. Prof. Dr. Tuğba Düzenli
| | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The course aims to provide the students with a general knowledge on types of human needs and requirements, types of user activities and activity equipment at outdoor spaces, and to help them to use their knowledge to design (create) land forms for different human activit |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | change and design topography of an area based on a design concept and user activities | 1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 | 4 | | LO - 2 : | define what the human needs for a particular outdoor activity are and to design activity areas with its equipment based on this knowledge. | 1,2,7,9,10,11,12,13 | 4 | | LO - 3 : | design multi-functional outdoor spaces.
| 1,2,7,10,11,12,13 | 5 | | LO - 4 : | construct and develop a non-existing (fictional) land form depending on its functions. | 1,2,7,10,12,13 | 5 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Basic user (human) needs and requirements, Types of user activities and activity equipments at outdoor spaces, Physical and psychological measurement depending on human and his activities, Scale and form in space organization Concept?form relations, Implementing expression and representation in three dimensional way, Working on models while deciding the form and scale of spatial organization. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Deciding subject and study area. Model of land topography. | | | Week 2 | Analyzing study area, resource values, possibilities (opportunities) of the area depending on these, literature review about the subject. | | | Week 3 | Determining user needs in relation to subject, list of human needs. Function scheme, needs-possibilities analyze. | | | Week 4 | Developing a scenario in relation to subject, brain storming technique, and thinking with drawing technique. | | | Week 5 | Priorities of function scheme for the given area, drawing the scenario considering area analyzes and needs. Suggestion-criticism. | | | Week 6 | Suggesting designs, developing multiple choices, discussion and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 7 | Suggesting designs and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 8 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 9 | Discussing and choosing the proposed designs, discussing the chosen designs and the ways to improve them. | | | Week 10 | Theoretical expansion of the subject, preventing deviations from subject, discussing proposed designs. | | | Week 11 | Discussing proposed designs. Attaining a certain level at plan presentations. | | | Week 12 | Analyzing sections and siluettes, developing proposals, discussion and concluding, section and plan relationship. | | | Week 13 | Improving sections, discussion of details, checking plan-section and siluettes in relation to each other, feed back. | | | Week 14 | Checking the project as a whole; plans, sections, siluettes, details and model. | | | Week 15 | Preparing the final project, however, anyone who need can ask for correction. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Dee, C. 2001; Form and Fabric in Landscape Architecture: A Visual Introduction, Spon Pres | | | 2 | Ferrater, B., Ferrater, C., 2006, Synchronizing Geometry: Landscape, Architecture and Construction / Ideographic Resources, Actar. | | | 3 | Grant, W., 1993, From Concept to Form: In Landscape Design, Wiley. | | | |
| 1 | Gaventa, S., 2006, New Public Spaces, Miller's Buying Guides. | | | 2 | Hannebaum, L. G., 2001, Landscape Design: A Practical Approach (5th edition), Prentice Hall. | | | 3 | Reed, P., Corner, J., Latz, P., Schwartz, M., 2005, Groundswell: Constructing the Contemporary Landscape, The Museum of Modern Art, New York; New title edition. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 24/05/2010 | 225 | 100 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 4 | 14 | 56 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 7 | 14 | 98 | | Uygulama | 4 | 14 | 56 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 11 | 1 | 11 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Total work load | | | 225 |
|