|
|
| MIMB201 | Architectural Design Theories | 4+0+0 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 4 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | -- | | Co-Lecturer | Lect. Dr. Cengiz Tavşan | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | To furnish students with architectural knowledge before the design process. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | ınterrogate the 'design' concept in context of different diciplines. | 2,6,8 | 1 | | LO - 2 : | anallyse the ' design' concept in different diciplines and the analyzing their relationship with architectural design. | 2,6,7 | 1,3 | | LO - 3 : | discuss about the creativity in architectural design through the architects and the design activity/ product. | 2,3,6,7,8 | 3 | | LO - 4 : | discuss about the creativity in architectural design in the context of design concept and approaches. | 2,3,6,7,8 | 3 | | LO - 5 : | discuss the experimental studies in the name of developing the creativity in architecture. | 2,3,6,7,8,9,12 | 1,3,5 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Explanations of Design and Architectural Design concepts related to scientific knowlodge and modern evaluations systems. Evolution of design and Architectural design process. Architectural Design methodologies, techniques and tendencies and also applications of them on Architectural Design projects. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Input and course of lesson to be presented | | | Week 2 | Design and architecture overwiev | | | Week 3 | Design, patients, the relationship between science and design evolution. | | | Week 4 | Design in architecture and design process. | | | Week 5 | The definition of creativity and creativity in architecture. | | | Week 6 | The design and information architecture. | | | Week 7 | Definition of Strategy and design strategies. | | | Week 8 | Differen Tecniques and approach in Architectural design-induction and deduct. | | | Week 9 | Mid-term study | | | Week 10 | Pragmatic method, architecs and their design methods- video | | | Week 11 | Analogic method, architecs and their design methods- video | | | Week 12 | 2. exam(homework ) | | | Week 13 | Canonic method, architecs and their design methods- video | | | Week 14 | Conceptual method, architecs and their design methods- video | | | Week 15 | Analyse of different buildings. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Aksoy, E., Mimarlikta Tasarim Iletim ve Denetim, KTÜ Yayinlari, Trabzon, 1975 | | | 2 | Ertürk, Z., Mimari Tasarim Teknikleri, K.Ü. Mühendislik Mimarlik Fakültesi, Trabzon, 1987 | | | |
| 1 | Aydinli, S., Mimarlikta Görsel Analiz, ITÜ Mimarlik Fakültesi, Baski Atölyesi, 1992, Istanbul | | | 2 | Francis D.K.Ching,Mimarlik: Biçim, Mekan ve Düzen, Yem yayinevi, 203, Istanbul | | | 3 | Uraz, T.U., Tasarlama Düsünme Biçimlendirme, ITÜ Mimarlik Fakültesi Baski Atölyesi, 1993, Istanbul | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 20/11/2013 | 2 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 15/01/2014 | 1 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 13 | 39 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 3 | 4 | 12 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 6 | 1 | 6 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Ödev | 7 | 5 | 35 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 6 | 1 | 6 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Total work load | | | 100 |
|