|
|
| FBE5001 | Scientific Research&Proposal Preparation Training | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | Second Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical, Distance learning | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | -- | | Co-Lecturer | PROF. DR. Asim KADIOĞLU,PROF. DR. Kemal ÖZTÜRK,ASSOC. PROF. DR. Önder AYDEMİR,PROF. DR. Zihni DEMİRBAĞ,PROF. DR. Zihni DEMİRBAĞ,PROF. DR. Kemal ÖZTÜRK,PROF. DR. Ali TEMİZ,PROF. DR. Korhan ÖZGAN,ASSOC. PROF. DR. Önder AYDEMİR,ASSOC. PROF. DR. Temel VAROL, | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | |
Aim of the course is to improve the writing skills of scientific research of students.
|
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | gain information about the project support sources | | | | PO - 2 : | having knowledge about scientific statements and how to sellect a research topic | | | | PO - 3 : | informing important points of about how to plan a research project | | | | PO - 4 : | learn how to share the outcomes and documents of a research project | | | | PO - 5 : | learn the important points of different strategies about how to write a research purposal | | | | PO - 6 : | learn about the common rejection reasons, and succes strategies | | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| The statements (ie. knowledge, science, scientific research, scientific events, experiences about scientific research) which are necessary to know before starting the preparation of the Project will be thought; after this, selection of a research topic of importance to the profession, identification of an appropriate theory / hypothesis base for the research, planning the purposed study, documentation and analysis of the results of the study will be discussed; students will practice how to write a research Project; Project samples which were accepted and rejected by TUBITAK will be discussed to improve the skills of students.
|
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Introduction, objectives, targets and contents. General description of the TUBITAK ARDEB programmes, Why the TUBITAK project should be written and be applied on? Description of the TUBITAK research database. | | | Week 2 | Some fundamental scientific concepts (knowledge, science, scientific research and types, scientist, researcher, etc.). The choice of the research topics. Determination of the hypothesis or problem. Factors affecting to establish hypothesis. | | | Week 3 | Literature search, research methods, data sources, The importance and necessity of literature. Strategies for literature. Group activity (determination of the project topic using by keywords). | | | Week 4 | Continue to group activity (writing project summary, purpose and targets). Preparation of personal projects | | | Week 5 | Research planning. Importance and stages of planning. Continue to group activity (writing the project subject, scope and literature). | | | Week 6 | Originality of the project subject. Establishment of the project management scheme, Design of the project work-packages, determination of the project team. Continue to group activity (writing the project originality and management scheme). | | | Week 7 | Analysis and documentation of the research results. Reporting and publishing (development and final reports). Introducing the scientific, technologic and socio-cultural impacts | | | Week 8 | Preparation of the project work-time schedule. Determining the budget and justification. Alternative methods (B plan). Explaining the success criteria. Continue to group activity (writing the project work-time schedule, budget and justification, and alternative methods). | | | Week 9 | Evaluation of the group projects | | | Week 10 | Scientific ethic and ethical issues. Continue to group activity | | | Week 11 | Introducing the TUBITAK panel and panellist process. | | | Week 12 | Presentations of the group projects and their evaluation process | | | Week 13 | Presentations of the group projects and their evaluation process | | | Week 14 | Presentations of the group projects and their evaluation process | | | Week 15 | A general overview. Student opinions | | | Week 16 | Evaluation of the personal projects | | | |
| 1 | John, H. Behling, Guidelines for preparing the researh proposal, University press of America, 2000. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 06/04/2019 | 1 | 30 | | Project | 13 | 15/05/2019 | 3 | 10 | | Presentation | 14 | 15/05/2019 | 2 | 10 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 28/05/2019 | 1,5 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 15 | 45 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 7 | 14 | 98 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 5 | 7 | 35 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 15 | 3 | 45 | | Diğer 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 225 |
|