|
|
| HUK1008 | Legal Philosophy | 3+0+0 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Doç. Dr. Mehmet SOYTÜRK | | Co-Lecturer | Yrd. Doç. D. Ahmed Niyazov | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The course aims to provide the students with a general knowledge on Legal Philosophy. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | Define the basic concepts about philosophy. | | | | LO - 2 : | Explain the relationship between philosophy and law. | | | | LO - 3 : | Analyze the universal principles of law. | | | | LO - 4 : | Cognize the judicial independence and objectivity. | | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Definition of philosophy, relationship between philosophy and law, moral dimension of law, law and social relations, historical legal trends, the importance of the philosophy of law, the formation of the universal principles of law, judicial independence and objectivity. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 16 | Final | | | |
| 1 | Niyazi Öktem?Ahmet Ülvi Türkbağ, Felsefe, Sosyoloji, Hukuk ve Devlet, Der yayınları, İst. 2014 | | | 2 | Abdülhak Kemal Yörük, Hukuk Felsefesi Dersleri, İstanbul, 1958 | | | 3 | Adnan Güriz, Hukuk Felsefesi, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara, 2014. | | | |
| 1 | Richard Honig, Hukuk Felsefesi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi , İstanbul, 1935. | | | 2 | Gerhard Leibholz, Hukukun Gayesi, (Trc: Y. Abadan) İstanbul Hukuk Fakultesi Mecmuası/1937 | | | 3 | Aral, V. 2007; Hukuk Felsefesinin Temel Sorunları, Filiz Kitabevi, | | | 4 | Ronald Dworkin, Hakları Ciddiye Almak, Ankara, Dost, 2007 | | | 5 | GustavRadbruch, Beş Dakika Hukuk Felsefesi, Hukuk Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Arkivi, s. 2, çev: Hayrettin Ökçesiz, 1994 | | | 6 | Georg W. F. Hegel, Hukuk Felsefesinin Prensipleri, İstanbul, Sosyal, 2006 | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | | | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | | | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 4 | 3 | 12 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 6 | 3 | 18 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 102 |
|