|
|
| MIM2035 | VOID IN ARCHITECTURAL FORM | 2+0+0 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Nilgün KULOĞLU | | Co-Lecturer | | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Understanding the concepts of architectural form and void. Discussion of the voids to be created in architectural form. Preparing presentations by analyzing and interpreting the samples. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | The students will understand the importance of form and void in architectural form through history. | 2,3,8 | | | LO - 2 : | The students will classify the voids created in the form. | | | | LO - 3 : | The students will learn the functional and intellectual dimensions of voids. | | | | LO - 4 : | They will be able to critic on the void created in the architectural form. | | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Understanding the architectural form, understanding the functional and cognitive dimensions of the voids in the form. To understand the form through various architectural form examples, to classify the void and to make comments. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Introduction to the Course: Aim, Scope and Discussion of Method of the Course
| | | Week 2 | Space, Form, Void Concepts
| | | Week 3 | Void in Architectural Form
| | | Week 4 | Functional Voids (Entrance, Corner, Balcony / Terrace, Gallery / Courtyard / Atrium, Surface, Transition / Circulation)
| | | Week 5 | Cognitive Voids (Visual, Conceptual, Sculptural / Monumental, Perceptual)
| | | Week 6 | Discussions on the Functional Voids Examples
| | | Week 7 | Discussions the Cognitive Voids Examples
| | | Week 8 | Discussions the Functional and Cognitive Voids Examples
| | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam
| | | Week 10 | Student's presentations: Functional Voids | | | Week 11 | Student's presentations: Functional Voids | | | Week 12 | Student's presentations: Functional Voids | | | Week 13 | Student's presentations: Cognitive Voids | | | Week 14 | Student's presentations: Cognitive Voids | | | Week 15 | Student's presentations: Cognitive Voids | | | Week 16 | Final Exam | | | |
| 1 | Ching, F.D., 2004. Mimarlık: Biçim, Mekân ve Düzen, YEM Yayın, İstanbul. | | | 2 | İnceoğlu M., 2004. İnceoğlu N., Mimarlıkta Söylem, Kuram ve Uygulama, Tasarım YayınGrubu, İstanbul. | | | 3 | Kortan, E., 1992. Mimarlıkta Teori ve Form, ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı Atölyesi, Ankara. | | | |
| 1 | Onat, E., 1995, Mimarlık, Form ve Geometri, YEM Yayın, İstanbul. | | | 2 | Jencks,C., 1997. Theories and Manifestoes, Academy Editions, London. | | | 3 | Zevi, B., 1990. Mimariyi Görmeyi Öğrenmek, çev. H. D. Divanlıoglu, Birsen Yayınevi, İstanbul. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 12112019 | 1 | 30 | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 10
11
12
13
14
15 | | | 30 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | | | 40 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Ödev | 4 | 6 | 24 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 5 | 2 | 10 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 97 |
|