|
|
| TRH3036 | Republican History Seminar | 2+0+0 | ECTS:3 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of HISTORY | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Hikmet ÖKSÜZ | | Co-Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Uğur ÜÇÜNCÜ | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Determining a research subject in line with examination and evaluation of the sources of the Republican History, source research and material collection, evaluation of information, documents and findings, classification and spelling using scientific criteria. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | Examine and evaluate concepts, ideas and data related to the discipline of history with social science research methods, identify, analyze and discuss issues that have not been researched yet, and develop recommendations based on scientific findings and evidence related these issues. | 1 | | | LO - 2 : | Learn especially the historians who were pioneers in the Republican Historiography and the contents of important history books, the sources they benefited from, their influences and the studies about them | 4,6 | | | LO - 3 : | Evaluate Republican History sources critically and examine Ottoman sources by considering the social conditions in which they were written. | 7,9 | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Researching the subjects of the modern history by students according to their interests, determining the methodology within the framework of the subjects and time limits, preparing students for scientific studies, presentation and criticism of the seminars prepared by the students. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Content of the seminar course and teaching and evaluation methods of the course. | | | Week 2 | Determining the methodology and writing rules to be followed in the presentation and writing of the seminar | | | Week 3 | Students will work on subject selection together with the lecturer. Subjects will be discussed. Dates for presentations will be determined. | | | Week 4 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 5 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 6 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 7 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 8 | Midterm Exam Week | | | Week 9 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 10 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 11 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 12 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 13 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 14 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 15 | Making the seminar presentations by students according to the determined criteria (purpose, method, content, proficiency, question and answer). Evaluation of the presentations by the lecturer. | | | Week 16 | Final Exam Week | | | |
| 1 | Kemal Karpat, Türk Siyasi Tarihi, Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul 2014. | | | 2 | Nutuk, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara 1999. | | | 3 | Süleyman Beyoğlu, Ali Satan ed. , Modern Türkiye Tarihi, MÜ Yayınevi, İstanbul 2014. | | | 4 | Tevfik Çavdar, Türkiye?nin Demokrasi Tarihi, İmge Kitabevi, İstanbul 2013. | | | 5 | Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi I-II, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara 2012. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Presentation | 8 | 16.04.2024 | 1 | 50 | | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 16 | 12.06.2024 | 1 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 2 | 4 | 8 | | Ödev | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 2 | 5 | 10 | | Diğer 1 | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Diğer 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | | Total work load | | | 90 |
|