|
SEC 336 | Transparency in Architecture | 2+0+0 | ECTS:2 | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | Level of Course | First Cycle | Status | Elective | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | Lecturer | -- | Co-Lecturer | - | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | Transparency in architecture is a multi-dimensional concept which will be considered from different perspectives beyond being an expression of structural. In this course, it is aimed to investigate the different dimensions of the concept of transparency and to evaluate the building activity from paleolithic era to date. |
Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | LO - 1 : | relate the concept of transparency with architecture. | 6 | 1,3,5 | LO - 2 : | evaluate the buildings in terms of different dimensions of transparency. | 6 | 1,3,5 | LO - 3 : | evaluate the history of architecture in terms of transparency. | 6 | 1,3,5 | LO - 4 : | learn examining the history of architecture in the context of a concept. | 6 | 1,3,5 | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | |
The definition, aims and the situation of the concept of transparency in the architecture; perception and extents of transparency; reading architectural theories through the concept of transparency that belongs to both western and eastern civilizations which develop depending on many parameters such as traditions, beliefs, geography, climate, material and technology in the process from the prehistoric period up to the present and developing process of transparency; research and discussion through examples. |
|
1 | Tokyay, V.Z., 2010; Mimarlığın Oluşumunda Saydamlığın Işığı, Tasarım Yayın Grubu, İstanbul | | 2 | Elmalı, D., 2005; Mimaride Saydamlık- Opaklık Kavramları ve Cephelerin Algılanmasına Etkileri, YL Tezi, KTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon | | |
1 | Roth, L. M., 2000; Mimarlığın Öyküsü, 1. Baskı, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul. | | 2 | Curtis, W.J., 2005; Modern Architecture Since 1900, Phaidon Press, Hong Kong | | 3 | Conrads, U., 1991; 20. Yüzyıl Mimarisinde Program ve Manifestolar, çev. S. Yavuz, 1. Baskı Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı Yayınları, Ankara. | | 4 | Anonim, 1998; Arciscope Dergisi, sayı 1, İstanbul | | 5 | Zevi, B., 1990; Mimariyi Görmeyi Öğrenmek, çev. D. Divanlıoğlu, Birsen Yayınevi, İstanbul. | | 6 | Elmalı Şen, D., Candaş Kahya, N., Midilli Sarı, R., Sağsöz, A., 2009. ?The Evolution of Glass in Architecture: Transformation From Material to Skin of Building?, SERES 2009: I. International Seramic, Glass, Porcelain Enemal, Glaze and Pigment Congress, Papers Book, pp. 329-337, 12-14 October, Eskişehir | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | Mid-term exam | 9 | 12/11/2014 | 1 | 30 | Presentation | 12 15 | 03/12/2014 24/12/2014 | 2 | 10 | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 3 5 8 11 | 01/10/2014 15/10/2014 05/11/2014 26/11/2014 | | 10 | End-of-term exam | 16 | 31/12/2014 | 1 | 50 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 14 | 28 | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | Arasınav için hazırlık | 3 | 1 | 3 | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ödev | 2 | 4 | 8 | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 6 | 1 | 6 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | Total work load | | | 75 |
|