|
|
| SBP3037 | @Planning Theory and Techniques | 2+0+0 | ECTS:2 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of URBAN and REGIONAL PLANNING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Gökhan Hüseyin ERKAN | | Co-Lecturer | | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The aim of the course is to enable students to gain the skill of applying the correct planning model in different contexts and conditions by comparing planning models, and to help them understand the philosophical and conceptual depth of planning. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | can discuss planning approaches and choose the appropriate planning approach for the planning problem at hand | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 | 1, | | LO - 2 : | can define and manage a professional planning process | | 1, | | LO - 3 : | can examine and improve current planning activities | | 1, | | LO - 4 : | understands the relationship of planning with social, cultural, political, and economic fields | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 | 1, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| modern planning approaches, different theories and techniques in urban planning, early period planning approaches such as utopians and modernists, rational comprehensive planning, incremental planning, third way approach, value-oriented planning theories, advocacy planning,equity planning, collaborative and participatory planning models, strategic planning, analysis of the planning system in force in Turkey, rationality, systems approach, rational decision-making model, strategic decision-making model, interactive decision-making model |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Presentation of the course and explanation of what is expected from the students | | | Week 2 | Introduction to planning history: Early cities, Ancient period, Roman Era, Hippodamus, Vitruvius | | | Week 3 | Planning approaches from the Middle Ages to the Industrial Revolution - urbanization approaches, Thomas More and the concept of Utopia, utopian planners, ideal city models. | | | Week 4 | early modernist urban planners: Howard, Le Corbusier, Wright | | | Week 5 | modern planning theories, Comprehensive Planning, Rational Comprehensive Planning, Systems Approach | | | Week 6 | Critiques of Rational Comprehensive Planning; incremental planning, third way approaches | | | Week 7 | Value-oriented planning models; advocacy planning, equity planning | | | Week 8 | Value-oriented planning models; discussions on egalitarian planning and democratic planning | | | Week 9 | mid term exam | | | Week 10 | interactive decision-making models; participatory planning (Arnstein), communicative rationality (Habermas) | | | Week 11 | interactive decision-making models; communicative, collaborative, participatory planning theories | | | Week 12 | strategic decision-making models; game theory, strategic planning | | | Week 13 | The theoretical analysis of Turkey's planning system | | | Week 14 | Example game theory and planning model studies | | | Week 15 | Theoretical discussions and proposals regarding the future of planning | | | Week 16 | finals exam | | | |
| 1 | Ersoy, Melih. (der) 2018. Kentsel Planlama Kuramları. İmge Kitabevi. | | | |
| 1 | ERKAN, G. H., (2015). ?Allem Edip Kallem Edip Yapıyorlar?: Kent Araştırmalarında Güç Pratiklerini Bulgulamak . 6. Kentsel ve Bölgesel Araştırmalar Ağı Sempozyumu (pp.241-256). İzmir, Turkey | | | 2 | DPT. 2006.Kamu İdareleri İçin Stratejik Planlama Kılavuzu. 2.sürüm. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 18.11.2025 | 1 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 13.01.2026 | 1 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | | | | |
|