|
|
| PEM5261 | Rural Recreation Planing | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | Second Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Ertan DÜZGÜNEŞ | | Co-Lecturer | -- | | Language of instruction | | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The purpose of the course is to introduce students to basic rural recreation planning strategies and techniques as they apply to the rural recreation, natural and semi-natural recreation, and also leisure fields. To give students an overview of examining the interaction of recreation with culture and natural environment and the impacts of recreation on the rural environment. To educate rural-outdoor recreation activities on the development and marketing natural, historical, and archeological resources. To expose students to practical application on the concepts discussed mini-cases and field related examples. |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | learn the basic concepts related to recreation and ecological environment values of rural areas | | | | PO - 2 : | compare the new methodological approach and strategies for the application of rural recreation | | | | PO - 3 : | learn how natural environmental values that constitute it could be used in recreational development studies for rural areas | | | | PO - 4 : | with the projects and applications they carry out in the course, learn the creation of an environmentally friendly rural recreation approach in the use of natural resources in our country | | | | PO - 5 : | discuss the conflict between conservation policies and recreational zone in Turkey. In addition, students will be involved in discussion of the role of Partnership | | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| We will cover listed below;
General Information Relating the Course
Language, definitions, concepts of rural recreation,
Nature of recreation industry,
The classification of rural recreation activities
The characteristics of rural recreation
Application examples relating rural recreation in Turkey and in the World
Planning methods relating rural recreation
landscape Planning studies relating rural recreation
its impacts on the environment,
Host-guest interactions and vulnerability of natural resources
Strategies/principals of marketing "rural recreation", the ethics involved
Customer/user of countryside recreation services
Partnerships involved in rural recreation (WHO is involved?)
The discussion of the role of rural recreation in social and economical development
|
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | General Information Relating The Course | | | Week 2 | Language, definitions, concepts of rural recreation,
| | | Week 3 | Nature of recreation industry | | | Week 4 | The characteristics of rural recreation
| | | Week 5 | The classification of rural recreation activities | | | Week 6 | Application examples relating rural recreation in Turkey and in the World
| | | Week 7 | Planning methods relating rural recreation
| | | Week 8 | Landscape Planning studies relating rural recreation | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | its impacts on the environment
| | | Week 11 | Host-guest interactions and vulnerability of natural resources | | | Week 12 |
Strategies/principals of marketing "rural recreation", the ethics involved
| | | Week 13 | Customer/user of countryside recreation services
| | | Week 14 | Partnerships involved in rural recreation (WHO is involved?)
| | | Week 15 | The discussion of the role of rural recreation in social and economical development
| | | Week 16 | Final Exam | | | |
| 1 | Alexander, D.E., Rural Planning Form an Environmental Systems Perspective, 377p., 1999, Springer-Verlag, New York | | | 2 | Miles, C.W.N. and Seabrooke, W., Recreational land Management, E and F.N.Spon Limited, 238p., 1977, London | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 15/11/2016 | 2 | 30 | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 12 | 07/12/2016 | 2 | 20 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 03/01/2017 | 2 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 12 | 36 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 4 | 4 | 16 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Arasınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Uygulama | 3 | 4 | 12 | | Proje | 2 | 3 | 6 | | Kısa sınav | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Diğer 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | | Total work load | | | 95 |
|