|
|
| PEML7282 | Performance Evaluation in Open Spaces | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | Third Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | -- | | Co-Lecturer | | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The aim of this course is to provide the student with a general knowledge about people - environment interaction, to define the design and construction processes of urban environments and urban open spaces, to define the concepts of user needs, place performance, quality and user satisfaction provide. |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | Define the design and construction processes of urban environments and urban open spaces. | 1,2 | | | PO - 2 : | Student can evaluate place performance. | 1,2 | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Environment and urban open space concepts, people - environment interaction, user needs in urban open spaces, urban open space design process, post-occupancy evaluation concept, place performance, quality and user satisfaction in urban open spaces. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Concept of environment | | | Week 2 | Urban open spaces | | | Week 3 | People-environment interaction | | | Week 4 | User needs in urban open spaces | | | Week 5 | Design process of urban open spaces | | | Week 6 | Design and construction process of urban open space | | | Week 7 | Post-occupancy evaluation | | | Week 8 | Midterm | | | Week 9 | Place performance | | | Week 10 | Assessing the quality of urban open spaces | | | Week 11 | Assessing the user satisfaction of urban open spaces | | | Week 12 | "Post-occupancy evaluation" process in urban open space example | | | Week 13 | Students to determine a research presentation within the course and discussion | | | Week 14 | presentation of student works and discussion | | | Week 15 | presentation of student works and discussion | | | Week 16 | Final exam | | | |
| 1 | Frick, D., Hoefert, H. W., Legewie, H., Mackensen, R., & Silbereisen, R. K. (Eds.). (2013). Quality of Urban Life: Social, Psychological, and Physical Conditions. Walter de Gruyter. | | | |
| 1 | Preiser, W. F. (2001). The evolution of post-occupancy evaluation: Toward building performance and universal design evaluation. Learning from our buildings a state-of-the practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation. | | | 2 | Council, F. F., & National Research Council. (2002). Learning from our buildings: A state-of-the-practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation (Vol. 145). National Academies Press. | | | 3 | Preiser, W. F., White, E., & Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post-Occupancy Evaluation (Routledge Revivals). Routledge. | | | 4 | Woolley, H. (2003). Urban open spaces. Taylor & Francis. | | | 5 | Zimmerman, A., & Martin, M. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168-174. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | | | | | | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | | | | |
|