|
|
| MIM7260 | Conservation of Urban Hist. Site and Its Prob | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | Third Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Hamiyet ÖZEN | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The aim is understanding of theoretical and conceptual approaches in urban conservation and Its development in the historic districts, evaluation of the required criterions for the renovation and revitalization of the historic district or their usage in new improvements, adapted use of the industrial and others, and suggestion solution for the problem during the planning and management process |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | they can learn the place and the usage of urban conservation in planning of new urban areas. | 4,8 | 1,3,6, | | PO - 2 : | they can learn to discuss and interpret over the examples of urban conservation and investigate to transfer them to application. | 4,8 | 1,3,5,6, | | PO - 3 : | they can study the reflection of the foundations and institutions which are adhere in urban conservation and of legal arrangement to application. | 4,8 | 1,3,5,6, | | PO - 4 : | they can discuss the condition of the consciousness of historical environment in urban conservation, the hardnesses of transferring of act and arrangement to application and of the financial resources which are transferred to this area. | 4,8 | 1,3,5,6, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Evaluation and typological analysis of single building and building groups, street/block/ plotocusing on the unique architectural characteristics of the urban historic environment; current approaches and principals for designing new buildings or adding new parts to existing buildings in the empty/demolished/revitalization areas by the aid of defined characteristics of historic environment; related international and national regulations in this filed; approaches for the adaptive re uses and infill of different buildings and buildings groups; evaluation of the selected examples from Turkey and other countries. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | introduction to the urban conservation and its historical development | | | Week 2 | importance of historical urban spaces, urban identity and urban image | | | Week 3 | elements of urban identity | | | Week 4 | tarihi kentlerin bozulma nedenleri(fiziksel, işlevsel, sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel) | | | Week 5 | basic components of historic environment | | | Week 6 | concept or historic urban district, and basic evaluation criterions and urban conservation approaches | | | Week 7 | documentation and analysis techniques in the historic environment | | | Week 8 | adapted reuse, renewal and revitalization historic urban areas | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | economic of historic cities and historic areas | | | Week 11 | restoration works in historic urban areas | | | Week 12 | Student presentation | | | Week 13 | new approaches and new design in the historic areas | | | Week 14 | evaluation and design principles | | | Week 15 | discussions and interpretation of the selected examples both in turkey and other counties andthe role of tourism on urban conservation | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Kuban, D.,,2001, Türkiye?de Kentsel Koruma: Kent Tarihleri ve Koruma Yöntemleri, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul. | | | 2 | Cohen, N., 1999, Urban Conservation, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. | | | 3 | Cerasi, M. M., 1999, Osmanlı Kenti: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu?nda 18. ve 19. Yüzyıllarda Kent Uygarlığı ve Mimarisi, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul. | | | 4 | Fitch, J.M.,1990, Curatorial Management of the Built World: Historic Preservation, University Press of Virginia, USA. | | | |
| 1 | Appleyard, D., 1981, The Conservation of Europian Cities, 2th print, The Massachusets Institute of Technoloji, USA. | | | 2 | Orbaşlı, A., 2008, Architecture Conservation: Principles and Practice, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 22/11/2018 | 2 | 30 | | Project | 12 | 06/12/2018 | 2 | 20 | | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 16 | 10/01/2019 | 1 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 4 | 13 | 52 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 2 | 12 | 24 | | Arasınav | 1 | 8 | 8 | | Ödev | 3 | 10 | 30 | | Proje | 5 | 11 | 55 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 2 | 6 | 12 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 2 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 225 |
|