|
MIML7560 | RHETORIC IN ARCHITECTURE | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | Level of Course | Third Cycle | Status | Elective | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Serap DURMUŞ ÖZTÜRK | Co-Lecturer | | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | The purpose of the course is to research the potential relationship between rhetoric and architecture within the frame of theory. The course approaches to re-reading in architecture via rhetoric. |
Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | PO - 1 : | Summarize the basic and general concepts about rhetoric terminology | 2,3 | 2,3,5,6 | PO - 2 : | Analyse the historical interactions between rhetoric and architecture | 2,3 | 5,6 | PO - 3 : | Understand the relationship between architecture and theory | 2,3 | 5,6 | PO - 4 : | Gain to interpret architectural texts and concepts | 2,3 | 5,6 | PO - 5 : | Express their original ideas about the re-reading in architecture | 2,3 | 5,6 | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | |
In the content of the course, it is aimed to bring into question rhetoric theme that is used producing discourse in architecture. Rhetoric as coding style and a crucial tool for persuasion, is interested in configuration logic of the textual messages. Re-reading, which is served to theory of architecture as a method, suggests an intellectual route that is based on rhetoric canons and rhetoric interpretation technics. With this aspect, rhetoric in architecture will interrogate potential relations in textual representation of architecture. |
|
Course Syllabus | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | Week 1 | Introduction | | Week 2 | Theory and methodology in architecture | | Week 3 | The etimology, definition and history of rhetoric | | Week 4 | Basic terms in rhetoric | | Week 5 | Classical rhetoric tradition: Ancient Greek, Roman, Medieval, Renaissance, Enlightenment periods | | Week 6 | Contemporary rhetoric: argument, discourse, narration, criticism
| | Week 7 | Rhetoric as a new point of view | | Week 8 | Rhetoric as a new point of view | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | Week 10 | Choosing, reading/re-reading, interpreting/re-interpreting architecture texts | | Week 11 | Choosing, reading/re-reading, interpreting/re-interpreting architecture texts | | Week 12 | Choosing, reading/re-reading, interpreting/re-interpreting architecture texts | | Week 13 | Choosing, reading/re-reading, interpreting/re-interpreting architecture texts | | Week 14 | Choosing, reading/re-reading, interpreting/re-interpreting architecture texts | | Week 15 | Choosing, reading/re-reading, interpreting/re-interpreting architecture texts | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | |
1 | Durmuş, S. 2014. Mimarlık Düşüncesinin Retorik İnşası: Usûl-i Mi?mârî-i Osmanî, yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, KTÜ, Trabzon. | | 2 | Aristoteles, 1995. Retorik, çev. Mehmet H. Doğan, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul. | | 3 | Meyer, M., 2009. Retorik (La rhétorique, Presses Universitaires de France,2004), Dost Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara. | | 4 | Cicero, 2001. On the Ideal Orator (De Oratore, 1976), trans. James M. May and Jakob Wisse, Oxford University Press, New York. | | 5 | Booth, W. C., 2004. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication, Blackwell Publishing, USA. | | 6 | Foss, S. K., 2005. Theory of Visual Rhetoric, in Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods and Media (ed. Smith, Ken, Moriarty, Sandra, Barbatis, Gretchen ve Kenney, Keith), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 141-153. | | 7 | Richards, J., 2008. Rhetoric, Routledge, London and New York. | | 8 | Lanham, R. A., 1991. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms, 2nd Edition, University of California Press, London. | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | Mid-term exam | 9 | 06/04/2016 | 2 | 50 | End-of-term exam | 16 | 01/06/2016 | 2 | 50 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 12 | 24 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 1 | 1 | 1 | Arasınav için hazırlık | 1 | 1 | 1 | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 1 | 1 | 1 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | Diğer 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Total work load | | | 30 |
|