|
|
| MIM7173 | Formation in Urban Design | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | Third Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Sonay ÇEVİK | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Giving necessary information in theorical and practical area within urban design discipline, developing view and discussion power. |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | describe general comprehension of urban design discipline. | 2,3,4 | 3,5,6 | | PO - 2 : | describe effective/important people-movements in development of urban design. | 2,3,4 | 3,5,6 | | PO - 3 : | have capability for perception, cogniance and evaluation of urban in urban perception subject. | 2,3,4 | 3,5,6 | | PO - 4 : | look urban design in the context of forming and usages. | 2,3,4 | 3,5,6 | | PO - 5 : | informed about standart politics which are used in different practices and they will be able to have discussion ability with in context of it. | 2,3,4 | 3,5,6 | | PO - 6 : | have observer and researcher character in operational ?practical area. | 2,3,4 | 5,6 | | PO - 7 : | get seeing, cognizing, analysing, discussing and application views. | 2,3,4 | 5,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| The definition of urban design discipline, developments, educations; the effective / important people, theories, tendencies, movements/trends, the urban perceptual, the effective elements of designing urban space, the types, features, constitutions of urban space, the component and features of urban space, sub-regions, tendencies, associated positions, the principle of formation; in different workspace, questions- solutions, relevant standards and politics. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Introduction of lesson; about general process and subjects | | | Week 2 | The introduction of urban design disciplines, model of urban design, study areas of it, emergence-causes of urban design disciplines, the definition of urban designers, education of urban design-different institutional constitution, objects in urban design | | | Week 3 | People/researchers in the development of effective urban design, approaches and tendencies: biographies, contributions | | | Week 4 | Perception, urban perception, urban aesthetics, urban image, effective elements in cognizance of city | | | Week 5 | Gestalt psychology- theory and principles, qualities route design | | | Week 6 | Space: types, definitions, explanations , urban space: definition types, examples | | | Week 7 | Space: types, definitions, explanations , urban space: definition types, examples | | | Week 8 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 9 | Forming of urban outdoor space, components, forming of sub-space | | | Week 10 | Principles of forming urban outdoor space | | | Week 11 | Urban design policies: problem areas, strategies, instruments | | | Week 12 | Urban design policies- samples and discussions | | | Week 13 | II. Midterm: homework, presentation, discussion | | | Week 14 | Different working area: preservation, rehabilitation, revitalization etc. | | | Week 15 | Evaluation - results and discussions | | | Week 16 | Final exam | | | |
| 1 | Cullen, G.1971; The Consise Townscape, Architectural Press, London | | | |
| 1 | Çevik, S.1991; Mekan-Kimlik-Kimliklendirme, Doktora Tezi, KTÜ, Trabzon | | | 2 | Rossi, A.1973; Die Architektur der Stadt, Skizze zu einer grundlegenden Theorie der Urbanen Bertesmann Fachverlag, Düsseldorf | | | 3 | Lynch, K. 1960;The Image of The City,MIT Press | | | 4 | Trieb, M. 1974; Stadtgestaltung Theorie und Praxis, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Stuttgart | | | 5 | Trieb, M., Grammel, U., Schmidt, A. 1979, Stadgestaltungspolitik: Aufgaben, Instrumente, Strategien. Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, Stuttgart | | | 6 | Becker, H., Keim, K.D.1972; Wahrnehmung in der Stadtischen Umwelt-Möglisher impuls für Kollektives Handeln, Verlag Kieper, Berlin | | | 7 | Dittmar, M. 1978 ; Geplante Aussenraume. Wahrnehmung und Gestaltung von Aussenraumen-Ein Beitrag zum Problem dess Stadte-baulichen Entwurfs am Beispiel von Verliner Vohngebieten, Arbetshefte des Institut für Stadt-und Regional Planung, Berlin | | | 8 | Gehl, J.1987; Life Between Building, Using Public Space, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York | | | 9 | Krier, R. 1981; Stadtraum in Theorie und Praxis-an Beispielen der Innenstadt Stuttgarts, Stuttgart | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 8 | 29/03/2021 | 3 | 30 | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 13 | 03/05/2021 | 3 | | | Practice | 4 | 22/02/2021 | 3 | | | Presentation | 6
7
12
14 | 15/03/2021
22/03/2021
26/04/2021
10/05/2021 | 3
3
3
3 | 20 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 24/05/2021 | 3 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 13 | 39 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 5 | 5 | 25 | | Arasınav | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Uygulama | 5 | 1 | 5 | | Ödev | 20 | 5 | 100 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 50 | 1 | 50 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Total work load | | | 225 |
|