|
|
| MIML7520 | Magnificence in Architecture | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | Third Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Doç. Dr. Demet YILMAZ YILDIRIM | | Co-Lecturer | | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | is to provide an analytical aspect to relationship between the architecture-power-magnificence, which is showing the effect of past to present, formed in present especially with facility of new technological and material and come forward in the race of cities in the process of globalization. |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | to discuss the scales and forms of magnificence in architecture, | 2 | 5,6 | | PO - 2 : | to evalute magnificence in architecture in the historical process, | 2 | 5,6 | | PO - 3 : | to evalute effective qualities in the forming of magnificence in architecture, | 2 | 5,6 | | PO - 4 : | to discuss the positive and negative effects of magnificence space to the physical structure of cities | 2 | 5,6 | | PO - 5 : | to discuss how the magnificent spaces are perceived/ assessed by people . | 2 | 5,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| An analytical approach will be made to the relationship of architecture-magnificence by taking spaces which have different values of display both in building and urban scale. In this context, from the past to present, creation of magnificence anxiety which exist in architecture will be explicated in different building groups as mosques, churches, temples, tombs, efficience urban elements as triumphal archies, monuments, fountains, squares, natural and artificial environments will be discussed. Reflection of magnificent places to the city and the citizens will be examined. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | introduction of subject and method | | | Week 2 | Definition of magnificence, differing degrees of magnificence, magnificence in architecture, magnificence scales, positions in architecture | | | Week 3 | concepts which are described and defined magnificence in architecture, semantics, symbolism, permanence | | | Week 4 | concepts which are described and defined magnificence in architecture, semantics, symbolism, permanence | | | Week 5 | theories, theoretical approaches which are related with magnificence | | | Week 6 | actors in formation of magnificence in architecture | | | Week 7 | the reasons of magnificence in architecture ;in the view of requirements and the context of the socio-economic | | | Week 8 | the reasons of magnificence in architecture ;in the view of requirements and the context of the socio-economic | | | Week 9 | in term exam | | | Week 10 | effective qualities which are formed the magnificence in architecture; conceptual qualities, effective-support qualities | | | Week 11 | effective qualities which are formed the magnificence in architecture; conceptual qualities, effective-support qualities | | | Week 12 | perception, urban image, the effective elements which is cognized the city | | | Week 13 | perception, urban image, the effective elements which is cognized the city | | | Week 14 | social perception and social aesthetic | | | Week 15 | social perception and social aesthetic | | | Week 16 | final exam | | | |
| 1 | Yılmaz, D., 2011; Mimarlıkta İhtişam Olgusu?nun Farklılaşan Ölçeklerde/Düzlemlerde İncelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, K.T.Ü, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans ,Trabzon. | | | |
| 1 | Yılmaz, D., 2006; Mimarlıkta İhtişam, Y. Lisans Tezi, K.T.Ü, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans ,Trabzon. | | | 2 | Lynch, K., 1960. The Imagine of the City, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massochusetts and London. | | | 3 | Cullen, G., 1961. Townscape, Architectural Press, London. | | | 4 | Schulz, C.N.,1975. Genius Loci, Ent. Werfen in der Historischen Strasse, Berlin, 12-20. | | | 5 | Rossi, A.,1984. The Architecture of the City, The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts and London , England, | | | 6 | Kündiger, B., 2001. Fassaden der Macht, Architektur der Herrschenden,Verlag E.A., Seemann, Leipzig. | | | 7 | Foucault M., 1982. The Subject And Power, Critical Inquiry, The University Of Chicago Press, 8,4. | | | 8 | Russell, B., 1938. Power: A New Social Analysis, New York: W.W. Norton and Company, New York. | | | 9 | Şentüter, A., 1995. Mimaride Estetik Olgusu, İ.T.Ü. Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı Atölyesi, İstanbul. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 9 | 17/4/2022 | 3,00 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 07/06/2022 | 3,00 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 4 | 6 | 24 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 9 | 7 | 63 | | Arasınav | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Ödev | 9 | 4 | 36 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 9 | 6 | 54 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Total work load | | | 225 |
|