|
|
| SEC 309 | Participation in Planning | 2+0+0 | ECTS:2 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of URBAN and REGIONAL PLANNING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | -- | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | To give information about different actors, their roles and effects in the planning and space formation process in terms of planning discipline. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | understand theories of democracy and participation | 2 | 1 | | LO - 2 : | discuss role of participation in city planning | 11,14 | 1,6 | | LO - 3 : | develop an inside view on well-qualified planner and successful planning | 11,14,16 | 1,6 | | LO - 4 : | choose appropriate participation techniques and methods issue in question | 14,21 | 6 | | LO - 5 : | evaluate the sucess/failure of participation practices in planning | 21 | 5,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Theories of democracy and participation; concepts of public interest and representation; decision-making process; basic problems of participation techniques and models in planning process; examination of participation practices in city planning; evaluation of problems in process. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | The content of lecture - experience of participation in the life | | | Week 2 | Democracy and democracy theorems | | | Week 3 | Classic democracy | | | Week 4 | Participatory democracy | | | Week 5 | The role of educational participate in local level | | | Week 6 | Participation-represent-public good-examples | | | Week 7 | Participatory democracy in the world | | | Week 8 | Participatory planning in Turkey | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Participation in planning | | | Week 11 | The actors of the planning, make decision of process | | | Week 12 | Participation in planning of model and tecniques | | | Week 13 | The investigation of the examples of participation in planning | | | Week 14 | The investigation of the examples of participation in planning | | | Week 15 | Running after the future the democracy? Brainstorming | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Bumin, K. 1990; Demokrasi Arayışında Kent, Ayrıntı Yayınevi, İstanbul. | | | |
| 1 | Tekeli, İ. 1999; Modernite Aşılırken Siyaset, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara. | | | 2 | Bayramoğlu Yıldırım, F. 1996; Kentte Birlikte Yaşamak Üstüne, (ed. ) , WALD-Dünya Yerel Yönetim ve Demokrasi Akademisi Yayınları, İstanbul. | | | 3 | Kazgan, G. Kirmaoğlu, H. Çelik, Ç. Yumul, A. 1990; Kuştepe Araştırması, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul. | | | 4 | TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası. 1990; Kent Planlamada Yeni Gündem: Çevre ve Katılım, Belediyeler Planlama Hizmetleri Vakfı, Ankara. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 20/11/2012 | 1 | 25 | | Presentation | 13 | 18/12/2012 | 2 | 25 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 08/01/2013 | 1,5 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 1.5 | 14 | 21 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Ödev | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Diğer 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 62 |
|