|
|
| PEM2016 | Envirenmental Design Project III | 3+4+0 | ECTS:8 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | PEM2007-Environmental Design Project II must have been passed | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Hilal TURGUT | | Co-Lecturer | Assoc.Prof.Dr. Banu Çiçek KURDOĞLU, Assoc.Prof.Dr. Arzu KALIN, Assist.Prof.Dr. Sema MUMCU, Assist.Prof.Dr. Serap YILMAZ, Assist.Prof.Dr. Müberra PULATKAN, Assist.Prof.Dr. Aysel YAVUZ | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The general aim of the project is to create scenarios for common use areas, to construct outdoor activities and to produce spatial organisations for these activity areas in order to meet the recreational and social needs of restaurant users and other users in the designsite located on the lakeside with a sensitive ecosystem. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | Produce design solutions about design site depending on different kind of users.
| 2,3 | 3,5,6, | | LO - 2 : | Produce plan, section, siluette, detail solutions and models about the subject. | 2,3 | 3,5,6, | | LO - 3 : | Express the functional and aesthetic approaches in other words their design approach. | 2,3 | 3,5,6, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Literature study about the subject of Project. Composing an original scenario about the subject, Determining the needs of users depending on the subject, List of user needs, function diagram, need-affordances of project area analysis. Producing the first drafts of spatial organization in light of the previous evaluations and criticizing the produced drafts. Proposing-criticising draft process till the end of semester. Delivering the plan, section, siluette, model representations of design proposal on which consensus was made. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Deciding subject and study area. Model of land topography. | | | Week 2 | Analyzing study area, resource values, possibilities (opportunities) of the area depending on these, literature review about the subject. | | | Week 3 | Determining user needs in relation to subject, list of human needs. Function scheme, needs-possibilities analyze. | | | Week 4 | Developing a scenario in relation to subject, brain storming technique, and thinking with drawing technique. | | | Week 5 | Priorities of function scheme for the given area, drawing the scenario considering area analyzes and needs. Suggestion-criticism. | | | Week 6 | Suggesting designs, developing multiple choices, discussion and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 7 | Suggesting designs and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 8 | Midterm exam | | | Week 9 | Discussing and choosing the proposed designs, discussing the chosen designs and the ways to improve them.
| | | Week 10 | Theoretical expansion of the subject, preventing deviations from subject, discussing proposed designs. | | | Week 11 | Discussing proposed designs. Attaining a certain level at plan presentations. | | | Week 12 | Analyzing sections and siluettes, developing proposals, discussion and concluding, section and plan relationship. | | | Week 13 | Improving sections, discussion of details, checking plan-section and siluettes in relation to each other, feed back. | | | Week 14 | Checking the project as a whole; plans, sections, siluettes, details and model
| | | Week 15 | Preparing the final project, however, anyone who need can ask for correction. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Hannebaum, L. G., 2001; Landscape Design: A Practical Approach (5th edition), Prentice Hall | | | 2 | Grant, W., 1993, From Concept to Form: In Landscape Design, Wiley | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 02/01/2016 | | 100 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 7 | 14 | 98 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 4 | 14 | 56 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Uygulama | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Ödev | 1 | 14 | 14 | | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 4 | 3 | 12 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 208 |
|