|
|
| PEM1000 | Architectural Design and Project | 2+1+0 | ECTS:9 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures and 1 hour of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Nilgün GÜNEROĞLU | | Co-Lecturer | ASSIST. PROF. DR. Serap YILMAZ, | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Contents of the CourseFamily, interior activity of house. House, environment and garden. Function diagrams of houses, individual house, mass house, holiday village, schools, university campus, marketing (shopping) centre, industry buildings, air port. Administration buildings and their function diagrams. The basic design approaches of environment of buildings depend on their interior functions |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | analyze and define the types and the relationship of a buildings (especially a house) interior and exterior functions and evaluate the type of activities according to these functions. | 1,2 | 4 | | LO - 2 : | design a house with its environment including circulation system and entrance. | 1,2 | 4 | | LO - 3 : | design a house in which they can live by emulating natural forms. | 1,2 | 5 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Objectives of the CourseTo teach students the interior activity of house and the basic design approaches of environment of buildings depend on their interior functions |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | The relationship of landscape architecture with other disciplines in context of objective and materials. | | | Week 2 | The content and aims of architectural design, the concepts of different functions, buildings with different functions and their environments. | | | Week 3 | Development plans, block, parcel, housing concepts. Students will draw the plans of their house in scale of 1/100 | | | Week 4 | Settlement patterns in development plans, projecting buildings. Students will adjust and redraw the parts of their houses which they don?t like. | | | Week 5 | Professional-client relationship, function scheme of a house, students will start to shape their house without any limitation. Building house-environment relationship, giving a name to their house. | | | Week 6 | Settlement patterns of housings in urban texture, the relationship of house-outdoor environment and the relations that must be taken account in environmental design, the house designed by students. | | | Week 7 | The relationship of house and its outdoor environment and space formation inside the house and its equipments, the house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 8 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 9 | Buildings with different functions and the factors influencing their environmental designs. Public housings and holiday villages, the house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 10 | Hotels-motels and their surroundings. The house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 11 | Education buildings, kindergartens and their surroundings. The house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 12 | University campuses and environmental design criteria. The house designed by students, criticism . | | | Week 13 | Administration buildings, city halls and their surroundings. The house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 14 | Health building, hospitals, their types and surroundings. The house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 15 | The house designed by students, criticism. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Ferrater, B., Ferrater, C., 2006, Synchronizing Geometry: Landscape, Architecture and Construction / Ideographic Resources, Actar. | | | 2 | Grant, W., 1993, From Concept to Form: In Landscape Design, Wiley. | | | 3 | Reed, P., Corner, J., Latz, P., Schwartz, M., 2005, Groundswell: Constructing The Contemporary Landscape, The Museum of Modern Art, New York; New title edition. | | | |
| 1 | Hannebaum, L. G., 2001, Landscape Design: A Practical Approach (5th edition), Prentice Hall. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 8 | 30/03/2010 | 3 | 30 | | Practice | 3
5
10
12 | 24/02/2010
10/03/2010
14/04/2010
28/04/2010 | 2 | 20 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 24/05/2010 | 2 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 3 | 4 | 12 | | Arasınav | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Uygulama | 1 | 14 | 14 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 5 | 3 | 15 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 75 |
|