|
ISL6512 | Current Issues in Production Management | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | Level of Course | Third Cycle | Status | Elective | Department | DEPARTMENT of BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | Lecturer | -- | Co-Lecturer | None | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | The main purpose of this course is to provide a good insight into the use of VIKOR , Entropi , Grey Relational Anaysis, Dematel and PROMETHEE approaches that are fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (FMCDM) methodologies in the evaluation of production/operations management problems. |
Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | PO - 1 : | define multi-criteria/multi-attribute methodology and approaches | | | PO - 2 : | formulate a multicriteria decision-making problem with the aid of other mathematical models | | | PO - 3 : | evaluate the obtained results of every MCDM technique used by the decision makers on the success of selected firm | | | PO - 4 : | report information coming from various sources and integrate them into the decision model | | | PO - 5 : | interpret the output reports making technical and economical analysis | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | |
VIKOR , Entropi , Grey Relational Analysis, Dematel and PROMETHEE approaches. |
|
Course Syllabus | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | Week 1 | Course objectives and outlines
| | Week 2 | Theoretical framework of VIKOR methodology | | Week 3 | An illustrative example of VIKOR approach | | Week 4 | Solving VIKOR problems using the Excel program | | Week 5 | Theoretical framework of the Entropy methodology | | Week 6 | An illustrative example of Entropy methodology | | Week 7 | Solving the Entropy problems using the Excel program | | Week 8 | Theoretical framework of Grey relational analysis | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | Week 10 | An illustrative example of Grey relational analysis | | Week 11 | Theoretical framework of DEMATEL methodology | | Week 12 | An illustrative example of the DEMATEL methodology | | Week 13 | Theoretical framework of Promethee methodology | | Week 14 | An illustrative example of Promethee approach | | Week 15 | A practical example for the selected course topics | | Week 16 | Exam | | |
1 | Zopounidis, C. and Dimitras, A.I., 1998; Multicriteria Decision Aid Methods for the Prediction of Business Failure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. | | 2 | Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.L., 1995; Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | Mid-term exam | 9 | 13/11/2017 | 1 | 30 | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 12 | 04/12/2017 | 1 | 20 | End-of-term exam | 16 | 09/01/2018 | 1 | 50 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 8 | 14 | 112 | Arasınav için hazırlık | 12 | 2 | 24 | Arasınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | Ödev | 3 | 2 | 6 | Kısa sınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 12 | 3 | 36 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | Total work load | | | 225 |
|