|
JDZ7215 | Deformation Measurements and Analysis | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | Level of Course | Third Cycle | Status | Elective | Department | DEPARTMENT of GEOMATICS ENGINEERING | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | Mode of Delivery | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Mualla YALÇINKAYA | Co-Lecturer | None | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | Determining of movements with different deformation models by using geodetic data. |
Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | PO - 1 : | get the meaning of geodetic deformation understand reasons of deformations; know deformation measurement areas. | | | PO - 2 : | constitute deformation network; get information about observation techniques at geodetic deformation network. | | | PO - 3 : | apply geodetic deformation analysis models (static, kinematic, dynamic) | | | PO - 4 : | make deformation analysis by using computer programming languages and present results. | | | PO - 5 : | write code in Matlab environment for deformation network analysis | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | |
Definition of deformation and history of the geodetic deformation measurements. Establishment of deformation networks. Univariant and multivariant networks. Optimization of networks and accuracy conditions. Measurement of geodetic deformation networks. Three dimensional adjustment functional model. Bivariant and multivariant adjustment models. Free adjustment of geodetic networks. Outlier detection methods. Deformation Models: Static Model, Kinematic Model, Dynamic models. Dam deformation measurement methods. |
|
Course Syllabus | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | Week 1 | Definition of deformation. Geometric differentiations. | | Week 2 | History of geodetic deformation measurement and analysis. | | Week 3 | Reasons of deformation. Structure of earth. | | Week 4 | Tectonic facts. | | Week 5 | Fault movements and Earthquake. | | Week 6 | Tsunami case. Change of the tide, HOMEWORK | | Week 7 | Deformation measurement areas: Engineering buildings, landslide areas, earthquake, industrial measurements. | | Week 8 | Deformation measurement methods. Geodetic and Geotechnical measurement tools. | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | Week 10 | Normal distribution. Test statistic. Hypothesis Testes. | | Week 11 | Design of deformation networks, network optimitation, measurements at geodetic deformation network, free geodetic networks adjustment, outlier detection methods. | | Week 12 | Deformation analysis models, Deformation analysis by Static Model. | | Week 13 | Deformation analysis by Kinematic and Dynamic Models. Analysis of significance of results and interpretation. | | Week 14 | Oral presentation. | | Week 15 | Oral presentation. | | Week 16 | Final Exam | | |
1 | Pelzer, H. 1988; Ingeniurvermessung, Deformationsmessungen Massenberechnung, Verlag Konrad Wittwer, Stuttgart. | | 2 | Niemeier, W. 1985; Deformationsanalyse, In: Geodatische Netze in Landes- und Ingenieurvermessung II, Kondrad Wittwer, Stuttgart, Germany. | | |
1 | Pelzer, H. 1985; Statische, Kinematische und Dynamische Punktfelder, Vortrage des Kontaktstudiums, Geodatische Netze in Landes- und Ingenieuvermessung II, Hannover, 225-262. | | 2 | Yalçınkaya, M.; 2003, Monitoring Crustal Movements in West Anatolia by Precision Levelling, Journal of Sueveying Engineering, 129(1), 44-49. | | 3 | Caspary, W.F., Rüeger, J.M., 1987; Concepts of Network and Deformation Analyses, National Library of Australia. | | 4 | EM 110-2-1009, 2002; Engineering and Design Structural deformation Surveying Department of theArmy US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000. | | 5 | Roberts, G.W.,X. Meng And Dodson, 2000; Structural Dynamic and deflection monitoring usingİntegrated GPS and Trixial accelerometers, 13th Int. Tech. Meeting of Satallite Division of the U.S. Ins.of Navigation GPS ION 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah. | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | Mid-term exam | 9 | | 1 | 30 | Presentation | 14 15 | | 1 | 10 | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | | 6 | 10 | End-of-term exam | 16 | | 1 | 50 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 5 | 10 | Arasınav için hazırlık | 1 | 5 | 5 | Arasınav | 1 | 1 | 1 | Ödev | 6 | 10 | 60 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 2 | 1 | 2 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 | Total work load | | | 121 |
|