|
ECZ3038 | BASIC BOTANICAL DRAWING FOR PHARMACY | 2+0+0 | ECTS:4 | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | Level of Course | Second Cycle | Status | Elective | Department | DEPARTMENT of PHARMACEUTICS | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | Mode of Delivery | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | Lecturer | Öğr. Gör. Şuayıp ŞEYİHOĞLU | Co-Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Ufuk ÖZGEN | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | Getting to know the plants used in pharmacy closely, gaining the basic theoretical, plastic, aesthetic and technical knowledge of illustration design in the application process. To emphasize the more important details in the composition, to extract and simplify when necessary, and to produce designs by applying exaggeration methods that will not affect the sense of reality. To ensure that the target audience is actively interested in plants. |
Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | LO - 1 : | Understands the importance of botanical plant drawing art in identifying plants and easily recognizes medicinal plants. | 1,4 | 3, | LO - 2 : | They comprehend the differences in the physical characteristics of the plants they draw and easily identify similarities and differences in nature. | 1,4 | 3, | LO - 3 : | The artistic process and observational practices applied when making botanical drawing art meet with the healing power we have in nature and knowledge develops. | 1,4 | 3, | LO - 4 : | This teaching helps capture the spirit, movement and aesthetic power of the plant. | 1,4 | 3, | LO - 5 : | Recognizes stem, leaf, flower and root details, color, form, texture, and proportion differences in plants. | 1,4 | 3, | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | |
History, purpose and importance of botanical drawing, basic theoretical, plastic, aesthetic and technical information about visual design. "Microscope Study, Working with Magnifier, Working with Naked Eye Perception" used in plant painting, "Pencil Technique, Watercolor Technique, Rapido Pen Technique, Dry Paint Painting Technique", Botanical drawing application file |
|
Course Syllabus | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | Week 1 | Presenting basic information about plant systematics and plant morphology | | Week 2 | Root, stem, leaf, flower, fruit, seed terminology and morphology | | Week 3 | History, purpose and importance of botanical drawing in pharmacy in general; Sharing and discussion of botanical drawing examples in pharmacy | | Week 4 | Detection and promotion of plants that can be the subject of botanical drawing process at global, regional and local scale | | Week 5 | Illustration definition; Introduction of materials used in plant illustration | | Week 6 | Large-small, frequent-sparse, far-near etc. on the plant surface. dynamic-static, symmetric-asymmetrical compositions, golden ratio in plants, form, light, toning, line-color | | Week 7 | Among the methods of finding details and differences on the selected plant, ?Microscope Study, Working with Magnifier, Working with Naked Eye Perception?; One of the botanical drawing techniques ?Pencil Technique? | | Week 8 | One of the botanical drawing techniques, ?Watercolor Technique? | | Week 9 | Midterm | | Week 10 | One of the botanical drawing techniques, ?Rapido Pen Technique? | | Week 11 | Botanical drawing techniques? Dry Paint Painting Technique? | | Week 12 | Botanical drawing (Application and discussion) | | Week 13 | Botanical drawing (Application and discussion) | | Week 14 | Botanical drawing (Application and discussion) | | Week 15 | Compensation Week | | Week 16 | Semester final exam | | |
1 | Yüksel, G. (2021). Bilimde grafik anlatı: Botaniğin görsel dili olarak illüstrasyon, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, Yüksek lisans tezi, İzmir. | | 2 | Ambrose, G. &Harris, P. (2012). Grafik Tasarım Temelleri Literatür Yayınları, Akademik Temeller Dizisi, İstanbul. | | |
1 | 1. Çavuş Beyaz, H. (2020). Çeşitli ülkelerden örneklerle bilimsel bitki illüstrasyonlarının grafik açıdan değerlendirilmesi ve tarihsel süreçte gelişimi, Yüksek lisans tezi, Kastamonu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kastamonu. | | 2 | 2. Z Dergisi (2017). Bitki ressamlığı. Zeytinburnu Belediyesi Kültür- Sanat-Şehir Tematik Dergi (1). | | 3 | 3. Tekiner, H., & Konca, S. F. (2017). Eczacı Ressamlar: Spitzweg, White ve Recouvreur. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, 7(1), 20-27. | | 4 | 4. Türkmen, B. B. (2021). Bilim ile Sanatın İş Birliği Üzerine Bilimsel İllüstrasyon Leonardo da Vinci İncelemeleri. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 14(28), 981-1011. | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 9 | 18.04.2024 | 2 | 50 | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 16 | 6.06.2024 | 2 | 50 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 14 | 28 | Arasınav | 1 | 2 | 2 | Uygulama | 2 | 12 | 24 | Ödev | 2 | 10 | 20 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 2 | 4 | 8 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | Total work load | | | 112 |
|