|
PEM3026 | Environmental Design Project-V | 3+4+0 | ECTS:8 | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | Level of Course | First Cycle | Status | Compulsory | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | Prerequisites and co-requisites | PEM3007-Environmental Design Projects-IV must have been passed | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Elif BAYRAMOĞLU | Co-Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Oner Demirel, Prof. Dr. Cengiz Acar, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Var | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | Depending on the subject of the project the course aims to provide the students with a general knowledge on solution of problems concerning the design of large sized urban and rural areas with recreational and touristic purposes, issues and principles of planning of urban plaza, patio, shopping centre and holiday village environments. |
Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | LO - 1 : | produce design solutions about subject (large-sized urban and rural areas, urban open space such as plazas-patios or holiday villages) depending on different kind of users. | 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 | 4 | LO - 2 : | produce plan, section, siluette, detail solutions and models about the subject. | 1,2,4,5,7,10,11,12,13 | 5 | LO - 3 : | express the functional and aesthetic approaches in other words their design approach for the environment they designed. | 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 | 5 | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | |
Literature study about the subject of project (large sized urban and rural areas, urban open space such as plazas-patios or holiday villages) ,
Composing an original scenario about the subject,
Determining the needs of users depending on the subject,
List of user needs, function diagram, need-affordances of project area analysis,
Producing the first drafts of spatial organization in light of the previous evaluations and criticizing the produced drafts
Proposing-criticising draft process till the end of semester
Delivering the plan, section, siluette, model representations of design proposal on which consensus was made. |
|
Course Syllabus | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | Week 1 | Deciding subject and study area. Model of land topography. | | Week 2 | Analyzing study area, resource values, possibilities (opportunities) of the area depending on these, literature review about the subject.
| | Week 3 | Determining user needs in relation to subject, list of human needs. Function scheme, needs-possibilities analyze. | | Week 4 | Developing a scenario in relation to subject, brain storming technique, and thinking with drawing technique. | | Week 5 | Priorities of function scheme for the given area, drawing the scenario considering area analyzes and needs. Suggestion-criticism. | | Week 6 | Suggesting designs, developing multiple choices, discussion and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | Week 7 | Suggesting designs and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | Week 8 | Mid-term exam | | Week 9 | Discussing and choosing the proposed designs, discussing the chosen designs and the ways to improve them. | | Week 10 | Theoretical expansion of the subject, preventing deviations from subject, discussing proposed designs. | | Week 11 | Discussing proposed designs. Attaining a certain level at plan presentations. | | Week 12 | Analyzing sections and siluettes, developing proposals, discussion and concluding, section and plan relationship. | | Week 13 | Improving sections, discussion of details, checking plan-section and siluettes in relation to each other, feed back. | | Week 14 | Checking the project as a whole; plans, sections, siluettes, details and model. | | Week 15 | Preparing the final project, however, anyone who need can ask for correction. | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | |
1 | Hong Kong Rihan International Culture Co.2007; Landscape Blackbooks, Ginkgo Press, | | |
1 | Hannebaum, L. G., 2001; Landscape Design: A Practical Approach (5th edition), Prentice Hall | | 2 | Lam, G. 2008; Landscape Design UK: Featuring Plaza Square, Institutional, Corporate, Recreational, Residential Projects, Links International | | 3 | Reed, P., Corner, J., Latz, P., Schwartz, M., 2005; Groundswell: Constructing the Contemporary Landscape, The Museum of Modern Art, New York; New title edition | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | End-of-term exam | 16 | 24/05/2010 | 300 | 100 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 6 | 14 | 84 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 16 | 14 | 224 | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | Arasınav için hazırlık | 0 | 0 | 0 | Arasınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | Uygulama | 5 | 14 | 70 | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 10 | 4 | 40 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 4 | 1 | 4 | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Total work load | | | 422 |
|