|
|
| HRT4042 | Property Assessment | 2+0+0 | ECTS:3 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of GEOMATICS ENGINEERING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Bayram UZUN | | Co-Lecturer | PROF. DR. Bayram UZUN, | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | 2 Day professional practise | | | | The aim of the course: | | To provide that the students have idea on land valuation methods, and produce valuation maps and also they use GIS for land valuation. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | Understand the terms property and valuation, and comprehend the importance of valuation in land management. | 11 | | | LO - 2 : | Understand methods of valuation and components of valuation in land compensation. | 11 | | | LO - 3 : | Understand functions of experts, and learn preparing expert reports and calculating land value. | 11 | | | LO - 4 : | Calculate land value using the nominal method and produce 2D-3D vale map of properties. | 11 | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Real estate, ownership and valuation concepts and importance of land valuation. Valuation legislations and methods. Determining of factors that effects value of land in valuation and unit value calculation. Valuation in privatization. Determining and updating of land valuation indexes. Instutional regulations. Producing and evaluating of land value maps. Using GIS in land valuation. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Introduction | | | Week 2 | Land, Real estate, Property and Value, Importance of land valuation. | | | Week 3 | General survey of Turkey land tax systems. Laws and regulations of Turkish land valuation | | | Week 4 | To Consider of land and parcel value criterias in land valuation | | | Week 5 | land valution methods | | | Week 6 | Comparing and discussing to land valution methods | | | Week 7 | Producing of 2D and 3D map to valuation and tax. Connection between valuation and cadastre | | | Week 8 | Offical structure and issue in Turkish land valuation | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Valuation in urban renovation (transformation). Condominium ownership law and it's application | | | |
| 1 | Yomralıoğlu, T., 1995. Tasınmazların Değerlendirilmesi, Ders notaları, KTÜ, Trabzon | | | 2 | Açlar, A. ve Çağdas, V., 2002; Taşınmaz (Gayrimenkul) Değerlemesi, 1. baskı, TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, Remark, Ankara | | | 3 | Yomralıoğlu, T., 1997a. Kentsel Alan Düzenlemelerinde Dmar Planı Uygulama Teknikleri, Tasınmazların Değerlendirilmesi ve Kat Mülkiyeti Mevzuatı, Jeodezi ve Fotogrametri Derneği, 1, 153-169, Trabzon | | | 4 | Nisancı, R. 2003; Kentsel Tasınmaz Değer Haritalarının Olusturulması, TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 9. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı,Kurultay Kitabı, 171-180, Ankara | | | 5 | Yomralıoğlu, T., 1993; The Investigation of a Value-Based Urban Land Readjustment Model And Its Implementation Using Geographical Information Systems, Doktora Tezi, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne | | | 6 | Yomralıoğlu, T., 2000. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Temel Kavramlar ve Uygulamalar, 1. baskı. Seçil Ofset, İstanbul. | | | 7 | Nişancı, R., 2005; Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ile Nominal Değerleme Yöntemine Dayalı Piksel Tabanlı Kentsel Taşınmaz Değer Haritalarının Üretilmesi, KTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon | | | 8 | Kone, L.D., 2006. Land Development Tenth Edition, Books That Build Your Business, ISBN-13, 978-0-86718-609-3 | | | 9 | Williamson, I., Enemark S., Wallace J. and Rajabifard A., 2009. Land Administration for Sustainable Development, ESRI Press Academic, Redlands, California. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 8 | | | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | | | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 12 | 24 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 1 | 7 | 7 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 1 | 5 | 5 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 8 | 1 | 8 | | Arasınav | 1.2 | 1 | 1.2 | | Ödev | 1.5 | 6 | 9 | | Proje | 1.5 | 5 | 7.5 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 12 | 1 | 12 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 1.3 | 1 | 1.3 | | Total work load | | | 75 |
|