|
|
| TDE5211 | Comment Information-I | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | Second Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of TURKISH LANGUAGE and LITERATURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | -- | | Co-Lecturer | Assoc. Prof. Dr. Fırat Caner | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | paraphrasing and interpretation of literary works |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | review information to be learned | 1,6,7,8 | 1,3, | | PO - 2 : | Learn the application of social science theory review information | 1,6,7,8 | 1,3, | | PO - 3 : | learn to research the meanings of the words and message of lower | 1,6,7,8 | 1,3, | | PO - 4 : | learn to apply the theory to literary works. | 1,6,7,8 | 1,3, | | PO - 5 : | Analysis of sample texts | 1,6,7,8 | 1,3, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Review understanding and comprehending
Analysis of sample texts |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Comments, understanding and comprehending | | | Week 2 | General information on the comment information | | | Week 3 | Pragmatic interpretation | | | Week 4 | Psychological interpretation | | | Week 5 | Basic understanding and high comprehension | | | Week 6 | Paraphrasing and interpretation | | | Week 7 | different understanding, prejudice and authority | | | Week 8 | Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer's thoughts on comments | | | Week 9 | midterm exam | | | Week 10 | relationship between knowledge and literary review | | | Week 11 | to provide information about its manufacturing process while reading text | | | Week 12 | The text in the context of integrating with other intertextuality evaluation and re-interpretation of the text, sample text analysis | | | Week 13 | author's intention, the relationship between reader and text, sample text analysis | | | Week 14 | provide information about Discourse Analysis Sample text mining | | | Week 15 | Final exam | | | |
| 1 | Dilthey, W. 1999; Hermeneutik ve Tin Bilimleri (Çev. Doğan Özlem). İstanbul, Paradigma Yayınları. | | | |
| 1 | Toprak, M. 2003; Hermemeutik ve Edebiyat, Bulut Yayınları. | | | 2 | Özlem, D. 1996; Metinlerle Hermeneutik (Yorumbilgisi) Dersleri, C. I-II, | | | 3 | Heidegger, M. 2008; Varlık ve Zaman [Çev.: Kaan H. Ökten], Agora Kitaplığı, İstanbul | | | 4 | Peter V. Z. 2004; Okur Tepkisi Eletirisinin Sorunları: Hermeneutikten Fenomenolojiye?, Modern Edebiyat Teorilerinin Felsefesi [Çev. Mustafa Özsarı], Hece Yayınları, Ankara | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 08/11/2016 | 2 | 30 | | Oral exam | 12 | 15/12/2016 | 1 | 20 | | End-of-term exam | 15 | 04/01/2017 | 2 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 6 | 14 | 84 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 6 | 14 | 84 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 9 | 2 | 18 | | Arasınav | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Ödev | 8 | 3 | 24 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 8 | 1 | 8 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Total work load | | | 225 |
|